Literatuur
Aarsen, M. & Van der Valk, A.E. (2008). Onderzoekende houding, een leerlijn. NVOX, 34(8)
Abraham, M.R. (1998). The learning cycle approach as a strategy for instruction in science. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Red.). International handbook of science education, (pp. 513-524). Kluwer.
Abrahams, I. (2011). Practical work in secondary science: A minds-on approach. Continuum.
Abrahams, I. & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14).
Abrahams, I. & Reiss, M.J. (2012). Practical work: Its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8).
Acar Sesen, B. & Ince, E. (2010). Internet as a source of misconception. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4).
Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (Red.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Anderson, R.D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Red.). Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 807-830). Erlbaum.
APA (2015). Top 20 principles from psychology for preK-12 teaching and learning. American Psychological Association, Coalition for Psychology in Schools and Education.
Arons, A.B. (1997). Teaching introductory physics. Wiley.
Artigue, M., Baptiste, P., Dillon, J., Jasmin, D., Harlen, W. & Léna, P. (2012). Learning through inquiry: Background resources for implementing inquiry in science and mathematics in school. Fibonacci Project. Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van http://www.fibonacci-project.eu/
Associatie Universiteit-Hogescholen Limburg (2019). STEMOOV-model. Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van https://stemoov.weebly.com/
Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bain, K., Rodriguez, J-M.C. & Towns, M.H. (2019). Chemistry and mathematics: Research and frameworks to explore student reasoning. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(10).
Bais, S. & Rijkenberg, B. (2010). Relativiteit: vwo6. Project nieuwe Natuurkunde. Stichting natuurkunde.nl.
Bakas, C. & Mikropoulos, T. (2003). Design of virtual environments for the comprehension of planetary phenomena based on students’ ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8).
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2).
Bandyopadhyay, A. (2009). Students’ ideas of the meaning of the relativity principle. European Journal of Physics, 30(6).
Bayram-Jacobs, D., Wieske, G., & Henze, I. (2019). A chemistry lesson for citizenship: Students’ use of different perspectives in decision-making about the use and sale of laughing gas. Education Sciences, 9(2).
Bennett, J., Lubben, F. & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of t he research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3).
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning for science instruction (Vol. 1). International Society for Technology in Education.
Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., Cabrera Giraldez M. (2022). GreenComp: Het Europees competentiekader voor duurzaamheid. Bacigalupo, M. Punie, Y Eds. EUR 30955 NL. Bureau voor publicaties van de Europese Unie.
Biesta, G. (2009). What kind of citizenship for European higher education? Beyond the competent active citizen. European Educational Research Journal, 8(2).
Biggs, J. (2012). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1).
Birriel, J.J. (2009). A simple demonstration of absorption spectra using tungsten holiday lights. Astronomy Education Review, 8(1).
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1).
Boersma, K., Van Graft, M. & Knippels, M.C. (2009). Concepten van kinderen over natuurwetenschappelijke thema’s. SLO.
Bolema, A. (2023). Formatieve Evaluatie en socio-scientific Issues (SSI): Een toegevoegde waarde voor het inzichtelijk maken van SSI-vaardigheden. NVOX, 48(2).
Bossér, U., Lundin, M., Lindahl, M., & Linder, C. (2015). Challenges faced by teachers implementing socio-scientific issues as core Elements in their classroom practices. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2).
Bouchée, T., de Putter-Smits, L., Thurlings, M., & Pepin, B. (2022). Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses. Studies in Science Education, 58(2).
Bouchée, T., Thurlings, M., de Putter-Smits, L., & Pepin, B. (2023). Investigating teachers’ and students’ experiences of quantum physics lessons: opportunities and challenges. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(2).
Boudreaux, A., Vokos, S. & Scherr R.E. (2023). Research on student learning of foundational concepts in Galilean and relativistic kinematics: The role of operational definitions. In M. Fatih Taşar & P.R.L. Heron (Red.). The international handbook of physics education research: Learning physics. AIP Publishing.
Bouwens, R. & Verkerk, G. (1988). Inventarisatie van misconcepties in de optica. Tijdschrift Didactiek der Bètawetenschappen, 6(2).
Bowen, C.W. (2000). A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1).
Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (Red.) (2000). How people learn. Brain, mind, experience and school. National Academy Press.
Braund, M. & Reiss, M. (2006). Validity and worth in the science curriculum: Learning school science outside the laboratory. Curriculum Journal, 17(3).
Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1).
Brouwers, T. (Red.) (1995). Natuur- en scheikunde in de basisvorming – Een praktische uitwerking in lesvoorbeelden. Thieme.
Bruggink, M. & Harinck, F.J.H. (2012). De onderzoekende houding van leraren: wat wordt daaronder verstaan? Tijdschrift voor Lerarenopleiders, 33(3).
Brunner, E. (2024). Instroomcijfers: Is er een top bereikt? Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Natuurkunde, 90(12).
Burghardt, M. & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design: A contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. Technology Teacher, 64(1).
Bybee, R.W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann.
Bybee, R.W., Carlson Powell, J. & Trowbridge, L.W. (2008). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Bybee, R.W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A. & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS instructional model: Origins and Effectiveness. [Rapport, 12 juni 2006] BSCS. Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van BSCS.org.
Cañas, A.J., Novak, J.D. & Reiska, P. (2015). How good is my concept map? Am I a good Cmapper? Knowledge Management & e-Learning, 7(1).
Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5).
Chi, M.T., Feltovich, P.J. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2).
Chou, Y.K. (2015). Actionable gamification: Beyond points, badges and leaderboards. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1).
Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10).
Colburn, A. (2003). The lingo of learning: 88 education terms every science teacher should know. NSTAPress.
Colin, P. & Viennot, L. (2001). Using two models in optics: Students’ difficulties and suggestions for teaching. American Journal of Physics, 69(S1).
Coll, R.K., France, B. & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2).
Court, J.E. (1999a). Free-Body Diagrams Revisited – I, The physics teacher, 37(7).
Court, J.E. (1999b). Free-Body Diagrams Revisited – II, The physics teacher, 37(8).
Crouch, C.H., Fagen, A.P., Callan, J.P. & Mazur, E. (2004). Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? American Journal of Physics, 72(6).
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Montijo, M. N., & Mouton, A. R. (2018). Flow theory: Optimizing elite performance in the creative realm. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Red.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 215–229). American Psychological Association.
Curriculumcommissie (2020). Kaders voor de toekomst. Tussenadvies 1. Wetenschappelijke curriculumcommissie.
Curriculumcommissie (2021). Examenprogramma’s in perspectief: Tussenadvies 3. Wetenschappelijke curriculumcommissie.
CvE (2012b). Natuurkunde vwo. Syllabus centraal examen 2016. College voor Examens.
CVN (2006). Natuurkunde leeft. Commissie Vernieuwing Natuurkundeonderwijs havo/vwo.
Damsma, W., Van Eijck, T., Van Gelderen, J. & Snelder, E. (2015). Onderzoekende en ontwerpende lessenseries. Pabo Hogeschool van Amsterdam.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6).
De Jong, T., Linn, M.C. & Zacharia, Z.C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130).
Dekkers P., Pols, F. & Van den Berg, E. (2024). Practicum wat hebben we (ervan) geleerd. NVOX, 49(10).
De Putter-Smits, L.G.A. (2012). Science teachers designing context-based curriculum materials: Developing context-based teaching competence. [Proefschrift]. TU Eindhoven.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. & Nacke, L.E. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9-15). ACM.
De Vos, W. & Verdonk, A. (1996). The particulate nature of matter in science education and in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6).
Dierdorp, A., Bakker, A., van Maanen, J., & Eijkelhof, H. (2014). Meaningful statistics in professional practices
as a bridge between mathematics and science: An evaluation of a design research project. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(9).
Dijk, G. van, Hajer, M., Kuiper, W., & Eijkelhof, H. (2022). Design principles for language sensitive technology lessons in teacher education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(2).
diSessa, A. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10).
Dimitriadi, K. & Halkia, K. (2012). Secondary students’ understanding of basic ideas of special relativity. International Journal of Science Education, 34(16).
Docktor, J. L. & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2).
Drijvers, P., Grauwin, S. & Trouche, L. (2020). When bibliometrics met mathematics education research: The case of instrumental orchestration. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 52(7).
Driver, R. (Red.) (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Open University Press.
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science – Research into children’s ideas. Routledge.
Duit, R. (1986). Der Energiebegriff im Physikunterricht. IPN.
Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography STCSE: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. IPN.
Ebbens, S. & Ettekoven, S. (2017). Actief leren – bronnenboek (4e druk). Noordhoff Uitgevers.
Eijkelhof, H.M.C. (1990). Radiation and risk in physics education. [Proefschrift]. Universiteit Utrecht.
Eijkelhof, H.M.C. & Kortland, J. (1988). Broadening the aims of physics education. In P.J. Fensham (Red.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 282-305). Falmer Press.
Eijkelhof, H.M.C. & Van der Veen, K. (1989). Werken met contexten in het natuurkundeonderwijs. NIB.
Ellerton & J. Cai (Red.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice, (pp. 215-240). Springer.
ENGAGE Project: Funded by European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-201. Grant agreement number: 612269.
Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T. & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3).
European Commission / EACEA / Eurydice. (2024). Learning for sustainability in Europe: Building competences and supporting teachers and schools. Eurydice report. Publications Office of the European Union.
Evagorou, M., & Dillon, J. (2020). Introduction: Socio-scientific issues as promoting responsible citizenship and the relevance of science. In: Evagorou, M & Dillon J. (Red.) Science teacher education for responsible citizenship: Towards a pedagogy for relevance through socioscientific issues, (pp 1-11). Springer.
Falk, J. & Dierking, L. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. AltaMira Press.
Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S. & Lin, S. S. (2019). Conceptualizing socioscientific decision making from a review of research in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3).
Feenstra, L., Julia, C. & Logman, P. (2021). A Lego® Mach–Zehnder interferometer with an Arduino detector. Physics education, 56(2).
Flokstra, J.H. (2006). Activerende werkvormen. SLO.
Fontys Hogescholen: d-team van lectoraat Mens en Technologie, Fontys HRM en Toegepaste Psychologie te Eindhoven. (2023) Quickstart design thinking
Frederik, I., Van den Berg, E., Te Brinke, L., Dekkers, P., Sonneveld, W., Spaan, W. & Van Woerkom, M. (2015). ShowdeFysica. NVON.
Frederik, I., Sonneveld, W., Van den Berg, E., Te Brinke, L., Dekkers, P., Pols, F., Spaan, W., Van Veen, N. & Van Woerkom M. (2017). ShowdeFysica 2: Natuurkunde laat je zien! NVON.
Frederik, I., Sonneveld, W., van den Berg, E., Dekkers, P., Langendonck, K., Pols, F., Spaan, W., Stadermann, K., & Van Veen, N. (2023). ShowdeFysica 3: Natuurkunde laat je zien! NVON.
Frederik, J.E. & Van Dijk, G. (Red.) (2012). Techniekdidactiek. Microweb Edu/ Ecent.
Freudenthal, H. (1990). Mijmeringen over het mechanica-onderwijs. Tijdschrift voor Didactiek der Bètavakken, 8(3).
Fyfield, M., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2021). Navigating four billion videos: teacher search strategies and the YouTube algorithm. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1).
Gamow, G. & Stannard, R. (2010). The New World of Mr Tompkins: George Gamow’s Classic Mr Tompkins in Paperback. Cambridge University Press.
Geerlings, T. & Van der Veen, T. (1987). Lesgeven als het verwerken van informatie. Van Gorcum.
Geerts, W. & Van Kralingen, R. (2025). Handboek voor leraren (4e druk). Boom
Geyer, M.A., & Kuske-Janßen, W. (2019). Mathematical representations in physics lessons. In G. Pospiech, M. Michelini & B.S. Eylon (Red). Mathematics in physics education, (pp 75-102). Springer.
Geuzebroek-Frederik, I. & Vrijman-Van Putten, M. (Red.) (2007). Ontwerpen moet je doen: creativiteit en motivatie met technisch ontwerpen. NVON.
Giddings, G. J., Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1991). Assessment and evaluation in the science laboratory. In B. E. Woolnough (Red.), Practical science, (pp. 167-178). Open University Press.
Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (1998). Understanding scientific evidence – Why it matters and how it can be taught. In M. Ratcliffe (Red.), ASE guide to secondary science education, (pp. 92-99). Stanley Thornes.
Gräber, W. & Bolte, C. (Red.) (1997). Scientific literacy: An international symposium. IPN.
Griffiths, A. & Preston, K. (1992). Grade 12 students misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6).
Gunstone, R. & Watts, M. (1985). Force and motion. In R. Driver, E. Guesne & A. Tiberghien (Red.), Children’s ideas in science, (pp. 85-104). Open University Press.
Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2012). Writing as a learning tool in science: Lessons learnt and future agendas. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin G., & C. J. McRobbie (Red.) Second international handbook of science education, (pp. 1375-1384). Springer.
Hajer, M & Meestringa, T. (2026) Handboek taalgericht vakonderwijs (5e herziene editie). Boom.
Halloun, I. & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11).
Hansson, L., & Yacoubian, H. A. (2020). Nature of science for social justice: Why, what and how? Springer.
Harlen, W. & Qualter, A. (2014). The teaching of science in primary schools. Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1).
Hawkins, D. (1965). Messing about in science. Science & Children, 2(5).
Henze, I., Bayram-Jacobs, D., Barendsen, E., & Platteel, T. (2020). Het bevorderen van burgerschapscompetenties in de natuurwetenschappelijke vakken met behulp van zelfgemaakt actueel en innovatief lesmateriaal: Een onderzoek naar karakteristieken van effectief burgerschapsonderwijs natuurwetenschappelijke vakken en kenmerken van leraren die zelf actuele burgerschapslessen ontwerpen. NRO: 40.5.18500.037
Hewitt, P.G. (2014). Conceptual physics (12th ed.). Pearson.
Hewitt, P.G. (2015). Instructor’s manual for conceptual physics (12th ed). Pearson.
Hewson, P.W. (1982). A case study of conceptual change in special relativity: The influence of prior knowledge in learning. European Journal of Science Education, 4(1).
Hidi, S. & Renninger, K.A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2).
Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science review, 70(256).
Hodson, D. (1992). Assessment of practical work. Science & Education, 1(2).
Hoekzema, D., Schooten, G. & Van den Berg, E. (2003). Behoudswetten, symmetrieën en elementaire deeltjes. NVOX, 29(5).
Hofstein, A. & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28(1).
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11).
Hoogeveen, P. & Winkels, J. (2022). Het didactische werkvormenboek. Variatie en differentiatie in de praktijk (10e druk). Van Gorcum.
Hooyman, K. & Vollebregt, M. (2006). De kracht van eenvoud – op weg naar een andere lesaanpak. NVOX, 31(1).
Horvath, J. C. (2019). Stop talking, start influencing: 12 insights from brain science to make your message stick. Exisle Publishing.
Hubers, S. (2004). Onderzoeken en ontwerpen van PO naar HO in een doorlopende leerlijn. SLO.
Jackson, J., Dukerich, L., Hestenes, D. (2008). Modeling instruction: An effective model for science education. Science Educator, 17(1).
Janssen, F. (2009). Het ombouwen van reguliere lessen in concept-context lessen in 5 stappen. In A. Legierse & A. Taminiau (Red.), Een enkeltje CoCo, (pp. 49-72). SLO.
Janssen, F., Hulshof, H. & Van Veen, K. (2016). Uitdagend gedifferentieerd vakonderwijs. ICLON UL/RUG.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Puig, B. (2011). Argumentation, evidence evaluation and critical thinking. In Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (Red). Second international handbook of science education, Springer Handbooks of Education nr 24, (pp. 1001-1015). Springer.
Johnson, P. & Gott, R. (1996). Constructivism and evidence from children’s ideas. Science Education, 80(5).
Kahneman, D. (2011). Ons feilbare denken. Business Contact.
Kanli, U. Y. G. A. R. (2015). Using a two-tier test to analyse students’ and teachers’ alternative concepts in astronomy. Science Education International, 26(2).
Kapp, K., Blair, L. & Mesch, R. (Red.) (2014). The gamification of learning and instruction fieldbook: Ideas into practice. Wiley.
Kieran, C. (2006). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In: A.Gutierrez & P. Boero (Red.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future, (pp. 11-49). Sense.
Kind, V. (2004). Beyond appearances, students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas. Royal Society of Chemistry.
Kisiel, J.F. (2014). Clarifying the complexities of school-museum interactions: Perspectives from two communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3).
Klaassen, C.W.J.M. (1995). A problem-posing approach to teaching the topic of radioactivity. [Proefschrift]. Universiteit Utrecht.
Klaassen, K. (2005). The concept of force as a constitutive element of understanding the world. In K.Th. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. de Jong & H. Eijkelhof (Red.), Research and the quality of science education, (pp. 447-457). Springer.
Klaassen, K., Westra, A., Emmett, K., Eijkelhof, H. & Lijnse, P. (2008). Introducing mechanics by tapping core causal knowledge. Physics education, 43(4).
Klaassen, K. & Doorman, M. (2015). Problem posing as providing students with content-specific motives. In F.M. Singer, N.F. Ellerton & J. Cai (Red.), Mathematical problem posing. From research to effective practice, (pp. 215-240). Springer.
Knevel, R. (2013). Taxonomieën zijn hot… en handig. Bureau ICE.
Knight, R.D. (2004). Five easy lessons: Strategies for successful physics teaching. Addison Wesley.
Knippels, M. & van Harskamp, M. (2018). An educational sequence for implementing socio-scientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL). The School Science Review, 100(371).
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall
Kolodner, J.L. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3).
Kolodner, J.L., Gray, J.T. & Fasse, B.B. (2003). Promoting transfer through case-based reasoning: Rituals and practices in learning by design classrooms. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 3(2).
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3).
Koopman, L. (2011). A developmental research on introducing the quantum mechanics formalism at university level. [Proefschrift]. Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Koops, M. (2011). The serious gaming lemniscate model for acquiring knowledge through simulation games. In M. Beran (Red.), Changing the world through meaningful play. Abstracts and papers ISAGA-conference 2010, (pp. 131-135). ISAGA.
Koops, M. & Hoevenaar, M. (2012). Conceptual change during a serious game: Using a lemniscate model to compare strategies in a physics game. Simulation and Gaming, 44(1).
Kop, P. (2023, juli). Supporting the interpretation of formulas in physics education through mathematics lessons. Thirteenth congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13). Budapest. Geraadpleegd op 4 april 2026 van https://hal.science/hal-04417511/.
Kop, P. & Eijkelhof, H. (2024). Wiskunde & natuurwetenschappelijke vakken en de omgang met wiskundige formules Een inventarisatie: Waar loopt men in het hoger onderwijs tegen aan als het gaat om formules? NVvW. Geraadpleegd op 4 april 2026 van https://www.nvvw.nl/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/verslag-interviews-HO-docenten-2024.pdf .
Kortland, J. (2005). Physics in personal, social and scientific contexts – A retrospective view on the Dutch physics curriculum development project PLON. In P. Nentwig & D. Waddington (Red.), Making it relevant – Context-based learning of science, (pp. 67-89). Waxmann Verlag.
Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4).
Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H.J., Brinkman, A. & Van Joolingen, W.R. (2017). Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education: A literature review. Physical review physics education research, 13(1).
Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H. J., Brinkman, A., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (2020). Secondary school students’ misunderstandings of potential wells and tunneling. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1).
Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H., Brinkman, A., & Van Joolingen, W. (2021). Prior knowledge of potential energy and the understanding of quantum mechanics. Physics Education, 57(2).
Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R.J., Van den Berg, E & Schuitema J.A. (2018). Effects of explicit instruction on the acquisition of students’ science inquiry skills in grades 5 and 6 of primary education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(4).
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Land-Zandstra, A.M., De Bakker, L., & Jensen, E. A. (2020). Informal Science Education. In F. Van Dam, L. De Bakker, A.M. Dijkstra & E.A. Jensen (Red.), Science communication: An introduction, (pp. 91-117). World Scientific.
Lazonder, A. & Harmsen, R. (2014). Hulp nodig? Een meta-analyse naar de effecten van ondersteuning bij onderzoekend leren. NWO-PROO: 411-12-210.
Lederman, N.G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present and future. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Red.), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 831-880). Erlbaum.
Lederman, N.G. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science – Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W.F. McComas (Red.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies, (pp. 243-254). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Leensen, M, (2025) De vele gezichten van een conceptmap. Didactief, 2025(1)
Lelliott, A. & Rollnick, M. (2010). Big ideas: A review of astronomy education research 1974-2008. International Journal of Science Education, 32(13).
Lepper, M.R., Greene, D. & Nisbett, R.E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28(1).
Levrini, O., & diSessa, A. A. (2008). How students learn from multiple contexts and definitions: Proper time as a coordination class. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 4(1).
Licht, P. & Snoek, M. (1986). Elektriciteit in de onderbouw. NVOX, 11(11).
Lijnse, P.L. (2014). Omzien in verwarring. Freudenthal Instituut.
Logman, P. (2014). Students reinventing the general law of energy conservation. [Proefschrift]. Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In N. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Red.), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 393-441). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marée, T.J., Van Bruggen, J.M. & Jochems, W.M.G. (2013). Effective self-regulated science learning through multimedia-enriched skeleton concept maps. Research in science & technological education, 31(1).
Marell, J., & De Vaan, E. (2023). Praktische didactiek voor natuur & techniek. Coutinho.
Marzano, R. J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D.J. & Pollock, J.E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works. Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Mayer, E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychology, 38(1).
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer teaching. Wiley.
McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Red.), The nature of science in science education, (pp. 53-70). Springer.
McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin Press.
McGrath, D., Wegener, M., McIntyre, T.J., Savage, C. & Williamson, M. (2009). Student experiences of virtual reality: A case study in learning special relativity. American Journal of Physics, 78(8).
McKagan, S.B., Perkin, K.K. & Wieman, C.E. (2008). Deeper look at student learning of quantum mechanics: The case of tunneling. University of Colorado.
McKagan, S. & McPadden, D. (2024). Best practices for whiteboarding in the classroom. Physport expert recommendations.
Meijerink, R. (2009). Begrip in kaart – Gebruik van concept maps in de klas. NVOX, 34(4).
Meyer, P., & Marohn, A. (2024). Mathematical grundvorstellungen in chemistry education: An approach to understanding chemical mathematics using the example of the concept of density. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(11).
Millar, R. (1997). Student’s understanding of the procedures of scientific enquiry. In A. Tiberghien, E. L. Jossem, & J. Barojas (Red.), Connecting research in physics education with teacher education, (pp. 65-70). International Commission on Physics Education.
Millar, R. (2010). Analysing practical science activities to assess and improve their effectiveness. ASE.
Millar, R. & Osborne, J. (Red.) (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. Nuffield Foundation.
Miller, E., & Kelly, A. M. (2024). Flipped science classrooms and the Cornell note-taking method. Science Scope, 47(6).
Mooldijk, A. (2005). Hysterese in een gloeilamp. NVOX, 30(4).
Muller, D. A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2008a). Saying the wrong thing: Improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2).
Muller, D. A., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2008b). Raising cognitive load with linear multimedia to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 92(2).
Multi-Stem (2025). Website over het benutten van thuistalen in de natuurwetenschappelijke vakken, techniek en wiskunde. Opgeroepen van https://multistem.net/nl/
Myers, D. (2009). In search of a minimalist game. In Conference Proceedings of DiGRA 2009: Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory. London.
Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (2000). Concept cartoons in science education. Millgate House Publishers.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-hall.
NGSS Lead states (2013). Next generation science standards: For states by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Noce, G., Torosantucci, G. & Vicentini, M. (1988). The floating of objects on the moon: Prediction from a theory of experimental facts? International Journal of Science Education, 10(1).
Novak, J.D. & Cañas, A.J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
Nussbaum, J. (1985). The particulate nature of matter in the gaseous phase. In R. Driver, E. Guesne & A. Tiberghien (Red.), Childrens’ ideas in science, (pp. 124-144). Open University Press.
OCW (2006). Besluit kerndoelen onderbouw VO. Ministerie OCW.
OCW (2025). Regeling aanmelding en toelating hoger onderwijs. Den Haag: ministerie OCW.
OECD (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework. OECD.
Olsen, R.V. (2002). Introducing quantum mechanics in the upper secondary school: A study in Norway. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6).
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7).
Ottevanger, W., Oorschot, F., Spek, W., Boerwinkel, D.J., Eijkelhof, H., De Vries, M., Van der Hoeven, M. & Kuiper, W. (2014). Kennisbasis natuurwetenschappen en technologie voor de onderbouw vo. Een richtinggevend leerplankader. SLO.
Özcan, Ö. (2011). What are the students’ mental models about the “spin” and “photon” concepts in modern physics?. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(2011).
Panse, S., Ramadas, J. & Kumar, A. (1994). Alternative conceptions in Galilean relativity: Frames of reference. International Journal of Science Education, 16(1).
Paus, J. (2012). Handreiking schoolexamen natuurkunde havo/vwo. SLO.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C.C, Zacharia, Z.C. & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14(2015).
Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. Brace Jovanovich.
Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W. & Boyle, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2).
Pol, H.J. (2009). Computer based instructional support during physics problem solving: A case for student control. [Proefschrift]. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Pols, F. (2015). Versnelling langs een helling. NVOX, 40(4).
Pols, F. (2016). Een foto of grafiek zegt meer dan 1000 woorden. NVOX, 41(2).
Pols, F, (2017a). Arduino op MTech scholen. NVOX, 42(1).
Pols, F. (2017b). Snaartheorie in de praktijk NVOX, 42(2).
Pols, F. (2018). Leerlingen leren onderzoeken. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Natuurkunde, 84(11).
Pols, F. (2019a). De mens van Vetruvius. NVOX, 44(6).
Pols, F. (2019b). De Scientific Graphic Organizer. NVOX, 44(8).
Pols, F. (2020). Practicum, net even anders NVOX, 45(8).
Pols, C. F. J. (2023). The Scientific Graphic Organizer for lab work. The Physics Teacher, 62(1)
Pols, C. F. J., Duynkerke, L., van Arragon, J., van Prooijen, K., van der Goot, L., & Bera, B. (2021). Students’ report on an open inquiry. Physics Education, 56(6)
Pols, C. F. J., Dekkers, P. J. J. M., & de Vries, M. J. (2022). “Would you dare to jump?” Fostering a scientific approach to research in secondary physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 44(7).
Pols, C. F. J., Dekkers, P. J. J. M., & de Vries, M. J. (2023). Integrating argumentation in physics inquiry: A design and evaluation study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2).
Pols, C. F. J., Dekkers, P. J. J. M., & Berg, E. v. (2024). Practicum, wat hebben we (ervan) geleerd? NVOX, 49(10).
Pols, F. & Dekkers, P. (Red.) (2024). Show the physics. NVON & TU Delft. Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026, van https://interactivetextbooks.tudelft.nl/showthephysics.
Poorthuis, H. (1999). Een oriëntatie op laagdrempelig probleemstellend onderwijs. [Proefschrift]. Universiteit Utrecht.
Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception; Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2).
Pospiech, G. (2023). An educational perspective on the connections between physics and mathematics. In J. Borg Marks & P. Galea (Red.), Physics teacher education: Challenges in physics education, (pp. 39-53). Springer.
Puig, B., Blanco-Anaya, P., & Pérez-Maceira, J. J. (2021). “Fake news” or real science? Critical thinking to assess information on COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 6.
Ratcliffe, M. (2001). Science, Technology and Society in school science education. School Science Review, 82(300).
Ratcliffe, M. & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. McGraw-Hill Education.
Redish, E. F., & Kuo, E. (2015). Language of physics, language of math: Disciplinary culture and dynamic
epistemology. Science & Education, 24(5–6).
Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naive physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1).
Reiss, M. (2007). What should be the aim(s) of school science education? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Red.), The re-emergence of values in science education, (pp. 13-28). Sense publishers.
Repko, A.F., Szostak, R. & Buchberger, M. (2014). Introduction to interdisciplinary studies. Sage.
Roberts, D. A. (1988) What counts as science education? In P. J. Fensham (Red.), Development and dilemmas in science education. (pp. 27–54). Falmer Press.
Rodriguez, L. V., van der Veen, J. T., Anjewierden, A., van den Berg, E., & de Jong, T. (2020). Designing inquiry-based learning environments for quantum physics education in secondary schools. Physics Education, 55(6).
Rodriguez, L. V., van der Veen, J. T., & de Jong, T. (2025). Role of analogies with classical physics in introductory quantum physics teaching. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1).
Romer, R. H. (1993). Reading the equations and confronting the phenomena—The delights and dilemmas of physics teaching. American Journal of Physics, 61(2).
Roth, W.M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Kluwer.
Roth, W.M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7).
Roth, W.M. & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5).
Roth, W.M. & Désautels, J. (Red.) (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. Peter Lang.
Rudolph, J. L. (2023). Why we teach science (and why we should). Oxford University Press.
Rutten, N.P.G. (2015). Teaching with simulations. [Proefschrift]. Universiteit Twente.
Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1).
Salomon, G. & Perkins, D.N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanism of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2).
Saltiel, E. & Malgrange, J.L. (1980). Spontaneous ways of reasoning in elementary kinematics. European Journal of Physics, 1(2).
Schalk, H. & Van Rens, L. (2017, 18 september). Leren onderzoeken: een leerlijn. Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van https://elbd.sites.uu.nl/2017/09/18/leren-onderzoeken-een-leerlijn/.
Scherr, R.E. (2001). An investigation of student understanding of basic concepts in special relativity. [Proefschrift]. University of Washington.
Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, meta-cognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D.A. Grouws (Red.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching, (pp. 334-370). McMillan.
Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., & Charusombat, U. (2009). Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research, 15(5).
Sherin, B.L. (2001). How students understand physics equations. Cognition and Instruction, 19(4).
Sidawi, M. (2009). Teaching science through designing technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3).
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y.J Dori, Z.R. Mevarech & D.R. Baker (Red.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education. Innovations in science education and technology, vol 24. (pp. 65-88). Springer.
Shaffer, P. & Mc Dermott, L. (2005). A research-based approach to improving student understanding of the vector nature of kinematical concepts. American Journal of Physics, 73(10).
Shipstone, D. (1985). Electricity in simple circuits. In R. Driver, E. Guesne & A. Tiberghien (Red.), Children’s ideas in science, (pp. 33-51). Open University Press.
Sinakou, E., Donche, V., Pauw, J. B. De, & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Designing powerful learning environments in education for sustainable development: A conceptual framework. Sustainability, 11(21).
SLO. (2019). Methodewijzer natuurkunde 2013. Laatste wijziging 29 oktober 2019. Geraadpleegd van https://www.slo.nl/@15363/methodewijzer-natuurkunde/
SLO. (2026a, 24 februari) Kerndoelen primair onderwijs- Tweede druk. Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van https://www.slo.nl/publish/pages/23186/kerndoelen-primair-onderwijs-slo-2025-tweede-druk.pdf
SLO (2026c, 1 april) Actualisatie van de examenprogramma’s. Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van https://www.slo.nl/thema/meer/actualisatie-kerndoelen-examenprogramma/actualisatie-examenprogramma/.
SLO (2026b, 24 februari 2026) Kerndoelen voortgezet onderwijs- tweede druk. Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van https://www.slo.nl/publish/pages/23189/kerndoelen-voortgezet-onderwijs-slo-2025-tweede-druk.pdf.
Smit, A.J. (2018). Complexe problemen oplossen: design thinking of ontwerpgericht onderzoek? Onderwijsinnovatie 20(2).
Somerset, A.H. (2002). Why students fail in math: A diagnostic survey of fifteen high schools in central Visayas, Philippines. National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education Development – University of The Philippines Diliman.
Southall, E. (2016). The formula triangle and other problems with procedural teaching in mathematics. School Science Review, 97(360).
Spaan, W., Oostdam, R., Schuitema, J., & Pijls, M. (2023). Thinking-back-and-forth in practical work experienced by students: identifying evidence-informed characteristics of good practices in secondary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 43(1).
Spaan, W., Oostdam, R., Schuitema, J., & Pijls, M. (2026). Teaching thinking-back-and-forth in practical work: results of an educational design study in secondary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 44(1).
Spek, W. & Rodenboog-Hamelink, M. (2011). Natuurwetenschappelijke vaardigheden onderbouw havo-vwo. SLO.
Stadermann, H. K. E., & Goedhart, M. J. (2020). Secondary school students’ views of nature of science in quantum physics. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6).
Steinberg, R., Wittmann, M.C., Bao, L. & Redish, E.F. (1999). The influence of student understanding of classical physics when learning quantum mechanics. In D. Zollman (Red.), Research on teaching and learning quantum mechanics, (pp. 41-44). Kansas State University.
Styer, D.F. (2011). Relativity for the Questioning Mind. John Hopkins University Press.
Stollman, S., Meirink, J., Westenberg, M., & van Driel, J. (2019). Teachers’ interactive cognitions of differentiated instruction in a context of student talent development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77.
Struick, E., Tsai, S., Kleinherenbrink, F., & Dekkers, P. J. J. M. (2024). Botsingen meten met iOLab. NVOX, 49(5).
Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction, 16(2).
Taasoobshirazi, G. & Carr, M. (2008). A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment. Educational Research Review, 3(2).
Taber, K. S. (2005). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, 89(1).
Takeuchi, T. (2010). An illustrated guide to relativity. Cambridge University Press.
Tamir, P. (1991). Practical work in school science: an analysis of current practice. In B. E. Woolnough (Red.), Practical science, (pp. 13-20). Open University press.
Thijs, G.D., & Van den Berg, E. (1995). Cultural factors in the origin and remediation of alternative conceptions in physics. Science and education, 4.
Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L.A. & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2-3).
Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G. & Mamiala, T. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11).
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom – Online instruction at home frees class time for learning. Education Next, 12(1).
Tuminaro, J., & Redish, E. F. (2007). Elements of a cognitive model of physics problem solving: Epistemic games. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 3(2),
Turşucu, S. (2019). Successful transfer of algebraic skills from mathematics into physics in senior preuniversity
Education. [Proefschrift]. Technische Universiteit Delft.
Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.
Uhden, O., Karam, R., Pietrocola, M., & Pospiech, G. (2012). Modelling mathematical reasoning in physics
education. Science & Education, 21.
Van Bemmel, H. & Callies, C. (2016). Ontwerp een muziekinstrument. NVOX 41(6), 286-288.
Van Borkulo, S.P. (2009). The assessment of learning outcomes of computer modeling in secondary science education. [Proefschrift]. Universiteit Twente.
Van Breukelen, D. (2021). Teaching and learning science through design activities: A revision of design based learning. [Proefschrift]. TU Delft.
Van Buuren, O.P.M. (2014). Development of a modelling learning path. [Proefschrift]. Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Van Buuren, O., & Heck, A. (2019). Learning to use formulas and variables for constructing computer models in lower secondary physics education. In: Pospiech G., Michelini M., Eylon BS. (Red.), Mathematics in physics education, (pp. 175-194). Springer.
Van den Akker, J. & Thijs, A. (Red.) (2009). Leerplan in ontwikkeling. SLO.
Van den Berg, E. (2014). De proefjeskist van Emmy en Jamie. NVOX, 39(3).
Van den Berg, E., Bom, P., Frederik, I. & Marell, J. (2013). Onderzoeken en ontwerpen met 4- tot 14-jarigen: Inspirerende praktijkvoorbeelden. NVON.
Van den Berg, E. & Buning, J. (1994). Practicum: leren ze er wat? NVOX, 19(6).
Van den Berg, E & Spaan W. (2020) Kracht begrijpen zonder impuls – onmogelijk, NVOX, 45(9).
Van den Berg, E. & Van Huis, C. (1998). Het tekenen van krachten. NVOX, 24(1).
Van den Berg, E. & Van der Veen, A. (2011). Onderzoeken op de basisschool?! NVOX, 36(8).
Van den Berg, E. (2013). The PCK of laboratory teaching: Turning manipulation of equipment into manipulation of ideas. Scientia in Educatione, 4(2).
Van den Heuvel, F. (2005). Samenhang? Moeilijk! Euclides, 80(7).
Van der Burg, C. (2008). Basisboek activerende didactiek en samenwerkend leren. CPS.
Van der Kooij, H. (2000). Dimensievolle algebra. Nieuwe Wiskrant, 20(2).
Van der Rijst, R. (2017, 7 mei). Zes aspecten van een onderzoekende houding. Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van https://elbd.sites.uu.nl/2017/05/07/6-aspecten-van-een-onderzoekende-houding/.
Van der Valk, A.E. (2017, 17 augustus). Begripsproblemen rond warmte en temperatuur. Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van https://elbd.sites.uu.nl/2017/08/17/begripsproblemen-rond-warmte-en-temperatuur/.
Van der Valk, T. Mooldijk, A. & Wooning, J. (2003). Guiding for inquiry learning: The falling cones case. In M. Michelini (Red.) Quality development in teacher education and training: Second international
GIREP seminar 2003; Selected contributions, (pp. 220-224). Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van https://www.fisica.uniud.it/urdf/articoli/ftp/2004/2004-13.pdf.
Van der Velden, K. & van de Kant,M. (2025). Elektriciteit en de weg van de minste weerstand? NVOX, 50(1).
Van Genderen, D. (1989). Mechanicaonderwijs in beweging: een onderzoek naar veranderingen in de didactiek van de mechanica in het voortgezet onderwijs.[Proefschrift]. Universiteit Utrecht.
Van Graft, M. & Klein Tank, M. (2014). Wetenschap & technologie in het basis- en speciaal onderwijs. Richtinggevend leerplankader bij het leergebied Oriëntatie op jezelf en de wereld. SLO.
Van Huis, C., Van Blohuis, B. & Van den Berg, E. (1994). Heeft een boek energie? NVOX, 19(5).
Van Keulen, H. (2009). Drijven en zinken. Wetenschap en techniek in het primair onderwijs. [Oratie]. Fontys Pabo Limburg.
Van Rens, L. (2005). Effectief scheikundeonderwijs voor ‘leren onderzoeken’ in de tweede fase van het vwo: Een chemie van willen, weten en kunnen. [Proefschrift]. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Van Riswick, J (2022) Kracht begrijpen vanuit het traagheidsprincipe. NVOX, 47(1).
Van Teeffelen, J. (Presentator). (2023, 12 mei). Meer motivatie om te sporten met behulp van gamification: Special guest Gerben Bakker. In Slimmer presteren podcast. (Seizoen 7, nr. 140). Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van https://slimmer-presteren-podcast.nl/seizoen-7/140-meer-motivatie-om-te-sporten-met-behulp-van-gamification/.
Vegting, P. (1986). Kracht, een moeilijk begrip. NVOX, 11(11).
Verhagen, P. (2011). Reflectie met de STARR-methode. Kwaliteit met beleid. Coutinho.
Veritasium. (2011, 17 maart). Khan Academy and the effectiveness of science videos. [Video]. Geraadpleegd op 7 april 2026 van https://youtu.be/eVtCO84MDj8?si=hGunCog707n9cjRz.
Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9(3).
Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 1(2).
Viennot, L. & Kaminski, W. (2006). Can we evaluate the impact of a critical detail? The role of a type of diagram in understanding optical imaging. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15).
Vilarta Rodriguez, L., van den Berg, E., de Jong, A. J. M. & van der Veen, J. (2024). Golf-deeltje dualiteit en golffuncties: Twee digitale lessen. NVOX, 49(3).
Visser, T., & Ornée, G. (2018.) Een goed geformuleerd, juist antwoord bij scheikunde en biologie – deel 1,2,3; NVOX, 43(5, 6 & 7).
Vokos, S., Shaffer, P.S., Ambrose, B.S. & McDermott, L.C. (2000). Student understanding of the wave nature of matter: Diffraction and interference of particles. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1).
Vollebregt, M., Klaassen, K., Genseberger, R. & Lijnse, P. (1999). Leerlingen motiveren via probleemstellend onderwijs. NVOX, 25(7).
Vollebregt, M., Hooyman, K. & Klaassen, K. (2006). Inhoudelijk motiveren – op weg naar een andere lesaanpak. NVOX, 31(1).
Voogt, J., & Pareja Roblin, N. (2010). 21st century skills. Discussienota. (Rapport opgesteld voor Kennisnet). Universiteit Twente.
Wandersee, J. (1990). Concept mapping and the cartography of cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10).
Wellington, J. (1990). Formal and informal learning in science: The role of the interactive science centers. Physics Education 25(5).
Wellington, J. (2003). Science education for citizenship and a sustainable future. Pastoral Care in Education, 21(3).
Wells, M., Hestenes, D., Swackhamer, G. (1995). A modeling method for high school physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 63(7).
Westra, R.H.V. (2008). Learning and teaching ecosystem behaviour in secondary education – Systems thinking and modelling in authentic practices. [Proefschrift]. Universiteit Utrecht.
White, R.T. & Gunstone, R.F. (1992). Probing understanding. Falmer Press.
Wieman, C. (2015). Comparative cognitive task analyses of experimental science and instructional laboratory courses. The Physics Teacher, 53(6).
Wieringa, N., Janssen, F.J.J.M. & Van Driel, J.H. (2011). Biology teachers designing context-based lessons for their classroom practice – The importance of rules-of-thumb. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17).
Wiliam, D. & Leahy, S. (2015). Embedding formative assessment: Practical techniques for K – 12 classrooms. Learning sciences international.
Wittmann, C., Morgan, J.T. & Bao, L. (2005). Addressing student models of energy loss in quantum tunneling. European Journal of Physics, 26(6).
Wright, G.W. & Park, S. (2022) The effects of flipped classrooms on K-16 students’ science and math achievement: a systematic review, Studies in Science Education, 58(1).
Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Social and ethical issues in science education: A prelude to action. Science & Education, 17(8–9).
Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1).